Comments on: Laryssa v. New Yorker Journalist George Packer

By: Ker-chunk

Ker-chunk — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:10:59 +0000

Defend what you do! Because it’s all that you do!

By: In Defense of Snark — Comma 'n Sentence

In Defense of Snark — Comma 'n Sentence — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:03:36 +0000

[...] how exactly does this steaming helping of schlocky snark add to the [...]

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:48:03 +0000

No offense. I’m sure you’re very nice.

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:24:19 +0000

This post exemplifies everything I despise about my generation. To a T.

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:23:21 +0000

It doesn’t.

By: Casso

Casso — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:32:27 +0000

So how exactly does this steaming helping of schlocky snark add to the discussion?

By: Boom

Boom — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:51:26 +0000

Poor you! Still smarting about where you went to college….Anyhow, read some of Packer’s books. You’ll be sufficiently awed to be more respectful.

By: Jennifer Deseo

Jennifer Deseo — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:28:09 +0000

BTW, Packer and Bilton are BOTH wrong on Twitter.

By: Stop the pissing match! « The Hyperlocalist

Stop the pissing match! « The Hyperlocalist — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:57:25 +0000

[...] spent on reading books (and not the electronic kind). The Atlantic Monthly got behind Packer, while others chided [...]

By: Amelia Jane

Amelia Jane — Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:18:27 +0000

This is hilarious! I used to be anti-twitter (’only twits tweet’) but since succumbing I’ve found so much information, because I follow people who write or link to things I want to read about. I do agree with Packer on one thing though; trains are a perfect place to read. 140 characters at a time, of course.